TED CASE STUDIES

Trade v. Development for Sub-Saharan Africa

Case: 559

 

 

IDENTIFICATION

LEGAL CLUSTER

GEOGRAPHIC CLUSTERS

TRADE CLUSTERS

ENVIRONMENT CLUSTERS

OTHER FACTORS

 

~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~// I. Identification

 

1. The Issue

This case study will examine the "HOPE for Africa Act" introduced as an alternative action to the "African Growth and Opportunity Act" a free trade act that was introduced in to 105th Congress. These two current pieces of U.S. foreign economic policy have taken divergent paths. The creators of both of these bill have different ideas of what type of policy is in the best interest of Africa and the United States. The "African Growth Act" was put before the the legislative branch last year by Congressman Philip M. Crane (R-IL) and Senator Richard Lugar (R-IN). This act proposes to contribute to the growth of sub-Sahara Africa through structural adjustment and trade liberalization. This bill was reintroduced to Congress in 1999 after its failure to make it through the Senate. The competing piece of legislation is the "HOPE for Africa Act" developed in reaction to the Crane-Lugar Act by Congressman Jesse L. Jackson, Jr. (D-IL) in collaboration with research from the non-profit group TransAfrica. The Jackson Act takes a humanitarian approach towards promoting sustainable development in Africa. The greatest point of contention is that the "HOPE Act" calls for a cancellation of all of Africa's debt to the United States, International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank.

 

The debate over whether the United States needs to enter into a free trade agreement or one of development and trade is divided along party lines. The "African Growth and Opportunity Act" has been compared to the North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) because it too looks to foster an atmosphere of free trade in Africa and serves the best interest of the U.S. economy. The element in question is whether or not it is in the best interest of Africa and if not is the Jackson Act an answer to the failures of the Crane-Lugar Act. The "Growth Act" has the support of corporate executives, eager to gain access to the natural resources of the African continent, and influential government figures of the sub-Sahara Africa who will be the direct beneficiary of American trade rewards. The "HOPE Act" looks to provide the tools so that the African people can build their own lasting development. It has the support of the African people and also interest groups that are looking out for the futures of the native Africans and severity over their land.

 

The Jesse Jackson, Jr. "HOPE for Africa Act" will provide the greatest opportunities to the nations of sub-Sahara Africa to achieve sustainable development and self-determination. If they are to have lasting stability the must be taught to use the tools and methods of maintaining their developmental efforts. Free trade and trade incentives are not the answer to the problems of this region. Poverty is a wide-spread problem and a lack of modern medical facilities have lead to incurable epidemics. What is needed are improved social programs not increased outside pressures from standards and regulations. As you read through this case study you will become aware of the "HOPE Act's" overarching plan to help create lasting sustainability in all facets of African life. This plan does not promise swift results but requires a commitment by the United States and the rest of the world to the development process in sub-Sahara Africa.

 

2. Description

This is a rare movement in history as Africa has gained increasing attention from the United Sates since President Clinton completed a successful mission to the African continent. For so long it has been a forsaken land only known for its majestic beasts and its beautiful sunsets. It has always been the image of poverty and disease. A region that lacks the educational standards of the western world. Sub-Sahara Africa is now making its mark on the world with substantial efforts to proceed forward with development plans. This began with a growing number of countries creating democratic political systems. It is time that we stop peering skeptically at Africa through a tiny keyhole and open the door to the continents full potential. Clinton's recent African tour was a monumental mission as it was the first time that a sitting U.S. President took on an extensive mission to this region. It was also the first time that any U.S. President visited the countries of Ghana, Uganda, Rwanda, South Africa, Botswana and Senegal (Rice- Trade).

Sub-Sahara Africa's most critical problem is its debt burden, some $230 billion in external debt alone, which eighty percent of its export dollar earnings (Jackson). The per capita income for sub-Sahara Africa averages less than $500 annually and per capita income fell from $752 in 1980 when neoliberal development model was initially imposed on numerous African countries to $613 in 1998 {in constant US dollars} (Jackson). Bilateral and multilateral debt burdens of sub-Sahara Africa constitute a serious impediment to private sector development, stable democratic political structure, broad-based economic growth, poverty eradication, the expansion of small and women owned businesses, food security, agricultural development aimed at feeding the continent's people, environmental sustainability and regional integration.

Africa has the largest number of poorest countries in the world. Thirty-Three of the Forty-One highly indebted countries (HIPC) are located in the sub-Sahara (Human Development Report). Indeed, 50% of African live below the poverty line, 40% living on less than a $1 per day and 40% of Africans suffer from malnutrition and hunger (Human Development Report). There is a child mortality rate that is compound by the fact that they are dying from things as simple as the flu. Many sub-Saharan countries are suffering from epidemics of AIDS, tuberculosis, Malaria and other diseases, many of which are treatable or preventable with existing pharmaceuticals and medical treatment.

"The Africa Growth and Opportunity Act" - H.R.1432 & S.778

Congressman Philip M. Crane

http://www.house.gov/crane

This bill was first introduced to the 105th Congress by Congressman Philip M. Crane (R-IL) and Senator Richard Lugar (R-IN). The is a trade bill for free trade between the U.S. and Sub-Saharan Africa. It has offered been compared to the North Atlantic Free Trade Act (NAFTA) and is sarcastically referred to by its opponents as "NAFTA for Africa". It was success in passing through congress but failed to make the majority vote in the Senate. It was again introduced to the new 106th Congress with hopes of being more successful in gaining support. It is currently be debated in comparison to an African development bill that was introduced simultaniously. When it was reintroduced in 1999 it was no longer sponsored by Senator Lugar. This bill serves the interests of U.S. corporations and is backed by companies that have a long history of having poor labor practices and environmental record.

 

 

This bill should be rejected for the following practices and requirements:

*Cutting domestic spending (health education, welfare)

*Cutting corporate taxes

*Ending agricultural subsidies (vital for food security)

*Compliance with harsh IMF terms which mandate debt payment as the primary national goal

*Opening all sectors for foreign investment (gives up control of vital resources)

*Joining the World Trade Organization (WTO)

 

Overall, the deregulatory and trade liberalization agenda removes crucial government protections for society and leaves local business vulnerable to foreign multinationals; and they encourage wage cuts, including in the minimum wage, weakening of labor laws and labor rights, and government and private sector employment cuts. Structural adjustment programs force recessionary policies that most seriously victimize the poor, and they tend to exacerbate income and wealth inequalities and undermine basic well being as measured by access to food, shelter, medical services and a sustainable livelihood, even when traditional economic indicators show economic growth. The bill fails to address the serious social issues of the African people but rather looks to line the pockets of U.S. corporate executives and African government leaders.

 

This is a new U.S./Africa trade and economic development policy that was introduced by Jesse L. Jackson, Jr. (D-IL) in February of 1999. The HOPE acronym stands for Human Rights, Opportunity, Partnership and Employment. These four principals set the guidelines of which this bill hopes to accomplish on its inception. It was created to develop legislation that would promote and support sovereign, equitable, sustainable African development, a goal that is in the mutual interests of the United States and Africa.This is a new U.S./Africa trade and economic development policy that was introduced by Jesse L. Jackson, Jr. (D-IL) in February of 1999. The HOPE acronym stands for Human Rights, Opportunity, Partnership and Employment. These four principals set the guidelines of which this bill hopes to accomplish on its inception. It was created to develop legislation that would promote and support sovereign, equitable, sustainable African development, a goal that is in the mutual interest of the people of the United States and Africa (Jackson Testimony). The legislation was developed over the past six months in consultation with African and U.S. citizen groups - church, labor, development, anti-hunger and more - as well as U.S. and African economists and trade specialists.

 

The "HOPE for Africa" legislation provides trade remedies that can be embraced by both working American and Africans because it raises the living standards of both. It does not raise some African living standards at the expense of lowering some American living standards. It is also good for long term business development and economic investment because average workers on both continents will be able to buy goods and services they produce and, in the process, build a fairer and more perfect economic world.

These are the four initiatives of the bill:

* Debt cancellation

African business development is not possible with 20% of all African export earnings now going into debt payment and no local credit markets possible. This debt that has been repaid many times over, but with compound interest and new loans to pay the interest of old loans, this debt will never be 'offically' satified. This debt must be wiped clean, a demand of the worldwide religious jubilee 2000 campaign. Thus the HOPE for Africa Act calls for cancellation of African foreign debt, starting with the relatively small debt owed to the United States covering the IMF, World Bank and private sector loans.

* African sovereignty to choose economic policies

The key principal underlying these goals, as specifically set forth by the African Finance Ministers in the Lagos plan for freedom for each African country to self-determine what economic policies suit the needs to their people and development.

* Sustainable economic opportunities

Grants African countries quota-free, duty-free market access for all goods listed under the Lome Treaty in which the United States is not a competing producer - these goods include a variety or minerals, tropical oils, and processed foods among other products.

* Restoration of equal treatment for Africa concerning foreign aid

To restore Africa's budget line item , for foreign aid, with a set guaranteed amount of aid not to decline below 1994 levels. This would restore parity for Africa with U.S. foreign aid treatment to other vital regions.

 

3. Related Cases:

Chiapas Uprising and Trade - Case 361
 Border Waste Trade: U.S. and Mexico - Case 85
 Legal Elephant Ivory Trade - Case 484
 I.D.E.A..S Homepage - Africa Project
 NAFTA Case 49
 Oil Pollution in Ogoniland - Case 149

 

4. Draft Author: Rebecca M. Brisch - April 7, 1999

 

II. Legal Clusters

 

5. Discourse and Status: Disagreement - In Progress

The case of support for either a trade bill with Africa or a development bill is testimony of the battle between economic self-interest and humanitarian ideals. Now as much of sub-Sahara Africa is striving for stability socially and economically the U.S. has taken the initiative to be the first to invest in the future of these African nations with the introduction of a free trade bill. The first bill was H.R.1432 "The African Growth and Opportunity Act" which traveled through Congress with few reservation and was later passed by two-thirds of its members. Members voted for the bill knowing that it was not perfect but believed that their concerns about the bill would be addressed and remedied in the Senate proceedings (Waters). The bill then traveled to the Senate to be further considered and scrutinized.

 

It was introduced to the full Senate as S.778 and was met by strong opposition and an unwillingness by its proponents to consider possible amendments and adjustments. This failure to compromise helped to urge dissatisfaction and the ultimate failure of the bill in the Senate. It was the belief of several members of Congress that amendments would be instituted by the Senate for partial cancellation of Africa's debt and would include plans for social programs to be established. The bill lost a great deal of support in both the Senate and the House when the Senate Finance Committee stripped away important provisions dealing with possible debt relief programs and added a "Fast- Track" legislation clause (Senate Finance).

 

The 106th Congress saw the reintroduction of the "African Growth and Opportunity Act" but it was without the co-sponsorship of Senator Richard Lugar who has shown some support for the alternative development bill. In February of 1999 the H.R. 772 "HOPE for Africa Act" was introduced in rejection of implementing a free trade agreement between the United States and Africa. Both of these bills are currently being discussed in Congress.

6. Forum and Scope: Sub-Sahara Africa - Bilateral

The dispute between the Crane-Lugar act and the Jackson act involves the lives of millions of Africans and holds the fate of the sub-Sahara region. It is not clear which will produce the most fruitful result but we can looks back to past experiences between the U.S. and developing countries. The most recent case is the economic devastation that was recently experienced and still continues to occur in Mexico as a result of NAFTA (Free Trade). This free trade agreement linking the United States, Mexico and Canada and forced Mexico into a further unstable economy in an attempt to compete with the developed economies of the U.S. and Canada. The "African Growth and Opportunity Act" seems to be designed explicitly to secure U.S. corporate interests at the expense of the interests and needs of the African majority and the sovereignty of their nations. Africa is a fragile continent that needs the support of the United States and other countries but not at the cost of the African people. The "HOPE Act" looks to rebuild from the bottom up by giving Africa a new beginning on solid ground. The outcome can only be speculated. Proposed incentives of this nature have not been able to fully achieve the original aspirations. This was due to the fact that they never fully implemented the plan with confidence and determination. We are living in a time of change and if we wish to have a future we must make the commitment to rebuild an independent and stable Africa.

 

7. Decision Breadth: 48 Countries of sub-Sahara Africa

The decision will have a substantial impact on all Forty-eight nations as it is their future on the line in the legislation being debated. The outcome of this policy will determine the level of development and the ability for these countries to maintain economic and political stability. Africa has been involved in a lot of internal conflict due to the implications of relative deprivation. People are unable to provide for their families, there is a high mortality rate, instability within the government and corruption are serious problems. Africa is shifting in an upward development swing and the international community needs to take advantage of the situation. If the United States does not take advantage of the international attention that is being given to Africa the continent might slip to a point where no form of development can reach a satisfactory level of success. While the failure of Africa will have no significant bearing on the welfare of the United states, its success will make way for a wide array of potential opportunities in both communities to live a better life.

 

 

8. Legal Standing: Bill in Congress

The resolution to this issue might manifest itself in the form of a free trade bill between the nations of sub-Sahara Africa and the United States. If this is the final decision it will be the result of fast-track legislation by President William Jefferson Clinton. The alternative possibility will be in the form of development programs to the sub-Sahara region beginning with basic social programs promoting self-determination and state sovereignty. There will be many objections and amendments leading to the implementation of this bill and for the most part will not be pasted in its entirety. The most likely, but not necessarily the best, outcome to this debate will be a compromise of both of these bills. The problem is that both sides are standing firm in their beliefs and the bills are establishing programs that would in many senses be counter productive.

 

III. Geographic Clusters

 

9. Geographic Locations:

a. Geographic Domain: Africa

b. Geographic Site: Sub-Sahara Africa

c. Geographic Impact: Sub - Sahara Africa

 

10. Sub-National Factors: No

Pressure is coming from interest groups in both the United States and Africa. While other countries have an interest in the out come of the final form that a U.S. foreign economic policy will take if an agreement can be met. They are not asserting pressure either way they hope to ride along on the coat tails of international action by the United States. The development of Africa has given attention of humanitarian groups around the world. For those organizations that are devoted to the African cause this legislation in the form of the "HOPE Act" seems to be the light at the end of the tunnel. The research has been well formulated and groups are unwilling to step down from their platform to get this bill passed in its entirety. One of the strongest organizations leading this fight is TransAfrica. The seek to help Africa gain its severity and insure that the people have the right to self-determination.

Human rights organizations such as Human rights Watch and Amnesty International also realize the importance of the Jackson legislation. It provides the ways and means to institute a successful program to educate the region on their basic economic, social and cultural rights. The sub-Sahara region is of interest to the human rights community because of recurrence of acts of genocide and the long history of denial of indigenous rights. It has been difficult to establish efficient programs with a strong international backing. When the "HOPE for Africa Act" is passed they will be able to setup comprehensive programs to ensure the development process will be a success.

 

The Crane-Lugar act has the financial backing of the lar"> 

11. Type of Habitat: Tropical Rainy Forest and Savanna

 

12. Type of Measure: Bill in Congress

The "HOPE for Africa Act" is still being discussed."> 

11. Type of Habitat: Tropical Rainy Forest and Savanna

 

12. Type of Measure: Bill in Congress

The "HOPE for Africa Act" is still being discussnd any trade measures would impede on this progress. This bill is an act of humanitarianism and will require the United States to remain patient will the programs are implemented. When this bill is passed it will require a delayed return on our investment of manpower in the sub-Sahara region but the results will be three-fold. The trade agreement is in the interest of the United States to gain direct access to the natural resources of Africa. If the "African Growth Act" is implemented is will be and any trade measures would impede on this progress. This bill is an act of humanitarianism and will require the United States to remain patient will the programs are implemented. When this bill is passed it will require a delayed return on our investment of manpower in the sub-Sahara region but the results will be three-fold. The trade agreement is in the interest of the United States to gain direct access to the natural resources of Africa. If the "African Growth Act" is implemented is will be a program of "Fast-Track" legislation directed by the President William Jefferson Clinton.

 

13. Direct v. Indirect Impacts: Both

 

14. Relation of Trade Measure to Environmental Impact

a. Directly Related to Product: Yes

b. Indirectly Related to Product: Yes

c. Not Related to Product: Yes

d. Related to Process: Yes

 

15. Trade Product Identification: Agriculture and Raw Materials

 

16. Economic Data

Despite areas of instability, Africa's economic trends remain relatively positive. Africa has thus far weathered the global financial crisis, unlike many other developing economies. More than 30 countries --two-thirds of African nations -- continue to implement far reaching macroeconomic reforms, including liberalizing trade and investment regimes, reducing tariffs, rationalizing exchange rates, ending subsidies, and stabilizing their currencies (African Development Bank). The continent's 15 stock markets are open for business, with over 1,000 companies listed. And large organizations such as the Southern African Development Community and the revitalized East African Community are moving the past few years, raising over $2.3 billion in government revenue to invest in infrastructure, education, public health, and economic development (African Development Bank). The continent's 15 stock markets are open for business, with over 1,000 companies listed. And large organizations such as the Southern African Development Community and the revitalized East African Community are moving Schoolbook">But what is really remarkable is Africa's vast potential for tomorrows creative entrepreneurs, especially in areas such as telecommunications and agribusiness. Telecommunications growth potential is incredible because the industry has yet to be introduced to the vast majorities. There is considerable promise for a range of other consumer industries as well. The majority of the African population is under the age of 15 because there is a cultural trend to have large extended families. IntroductioSchoolbook">But what is really remarkable is Africa's vast potential for tomorrows creative entrepreneurs, especially in areas such as telecommunications and agribusiness. Telecommunications growth potential is incredible because the industry has yet to be introduced to the vast majorities. There is considerable promise for a range of other consumer industries as well. The majority of the African population is under the age of 15 because there is a cultural trend to have large extended families. Introduction of the internet was a complete success though the funding for equipment has been sparse and the development opportunities are abundant. This is why it is imperative that a development agreement be set into motion and sustainable development be achieved in Africa.

Even with these improvement it could all be lost with the wrong type of relationship between the U.S. and Africa. The problem is that the IMF, the World Bank and other international lending institutions and aid agencies have forced African nations to adhere to "structural adjustment programs." These programs orient economics toward export production, placing downward pressure on wages, encouraging unsustainable resource exploitation and undermining food security. This lead to to major reductions in government spending, including in the critical areas of education, health care and environmental protection; and they particularly harm women, who are most severely hurt by the elimination of the social safety net and policy neglect (Robinson). This economic data shows the potential of Sub-Saharan Africa's growth and economic potential but it is a delicate situation that needs to be handled carefully so not to send the region into a downward spiral.

 

17. Impact of Trade Restriction: Low

 

18. Industry Sector: Agricultural and Raw Materials

 

19. Exporters and Importers: United States and Sub-Sahara Africa

Sub-Saharan African trade continues to play a marginal role as a share of trade between the United States and the world, and between the United States and other developing regions. In 1997, Africa accounted for only one percent of U.S. trade with the world and only five percent of total trade with developing countries (USAID, Sub-Sahara). A large portion of Africa's imports to the United States were for petroleum an industry run by American companies and one that has created a poor reputation throughout the region. South Africa is the largest importer of American goods due to its relative economic stability in comparison to its surrounding countries. By looking at the pie charts below the distinction between the stability of a develop country is demonstrated in its imports and exports. The United States has a higher technological capacity so it is able to export higher priced finished products resulting from a skilled labor force. Sub-Sahara Africa is exporting natural resources and raw materials that do not require a high level of modern technology or a highly skilled labor force. Africa is more reliant on the exports of the U.S. than we are on their imports. It is in the interest of U.S. corporations to gain direct access to the the resources and tap into the human capacity of the potential African labor force.

 

V. Environment Clusters

 

20. Environmental Problem Type: Biodiversity and Pollution

Sub-Sahara Africa is endowed with rich and diverse ecosystems- - from sparsely populated rain forests to densely populated savannas and drylands and from flat coastal zones to plateaus and highlands. Africa, however, faces enormous environmental challenges, including spreading deserts, shrinking forests, biological diversity loss, threatened coastlines, and water pollution. Natural disasters, population growth, civil strife, refugee migrations and infectious diseases compound these problems.

 

The Congo River basin rain forest, second-largest to the Amazon, is shrinking at an alarming rate (Greenpeace). The U.S. is working internffects of droughts and floods, mass migrations, and population growth but also to contribute to the continent's economic development potential.

 

The Congo River basin rain forest, second-largest to the Amazon, is shrinking at an alarming rate (Greenpeace). The U.S. is working internationally to ensure that harvests and exports of African tropical timber conform to sustainable management and conservation policies. The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) is involved in a 5-year, $14-million Central African Regional Program for the Environment Initiative, working directly with non-governmental organizations, local private organizations, and donors to reduce the rate of deforestation (USAID).

 

21. Name, Type, and Diversity of Species: Animal and Plant Life

 

 

24. Substitutes: Stronger Environmental Standards - Conservation Efforts

 

 

VI.Other Factors

 

25. Culture: Yes

Sub-Sahara Africa has a strong cultural identity that needs to be understood and respected before entering into any type of agreement either for trade or development. This is an essential aspect when dealing with any non-western nation. Africa is divided by their tribal ancestry that have formed a heirarchy in their society. The relationship between these tribes is important to negotiations and to comprehend levels of cooperation due to history between tribes. Tribal identities are the main source of internal conflict and occurrences of civil disobedience. Conflict in Africa tends to occur within the nation due to unstable governments and years of oppression against the African natives.

 

26. Human Rights: Yes

The issue of basic human rights has long been ignored on the African continent. The indigenous rights of the people have historically been violated but their European inhabitants. These same violations are the consequences of insurgences for social and political unrest. We have recently seen the genocide committed in Rwanda in the most barbaric methods between the Hutus and the Tutis. Currently a massive civil war is taking place in Sierra Leone and the acts of genocide are wide-spread. These acts have altered the mentality of the Africans and have have a negative impact on international investment in Africa as a whole. The right of self-determination has never been given to the African population. Policies that take away from their basic social programs need to be avoided because it denies them the educational tools to gain the skills to move ahead in life. Access to basic health facilities and health education to help curb the growing epidemic of infectious diseases.

 

27. Trans-Boundary Issues: Yes

The case of development in sub-Sahara Africa will be a project requiring the cooperation and contribution of resources from all Forty-eight countries. They will hopefully be working to gain self-determination but with this growth these African nations will also need to trade amongst themselves. In the case of industrial growth the nations must come together to create a uniform set of environmental regulations. The actions of each country will inevitably have an economic, social and environmental effect on their neighbors.

28. Relevant Literature:

1. Rice, Sharon "U.S. Trade & Investment in Africa" http://www.info.usaid.gov

2. "Sub-Saharan Africa" http://www.info.usaid.gov

3. Waters, Maxine "Letter from Congresswomen Maxine Waters" http://www.citizen.org

4. Senate Finance Committee http://www.senate.gov/~finance/

5. Jackson, Jr., Jesse "Testimony Before Ways & Means Sub-Committee on Trade" http://www.jessejacksonjr.org

6. Greenpeace http://www.Greenpeace.org/~climate/database/records/zgpz0008.htmlzgpz0008.html

7. "Human Development Report" http://www.undp.org

8. "HOPE for Africa Homepage" http://www.citizen.org/pctrade/Africa/HOPE/hopehome

9. "HOPE for Africa Act" http://tomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/z?c106:h.r.772:

10. "African Growth and Opportunity Act" http://tomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/z?c106:h.r.1432:

11. Jubilee 2000 http://www.one world.org/jubilee2000

12. Free Trade Bill "Force a Free Trade Agreement" http://www.heritage.org

13. U.S. Department of Agriculture http://www.info.usda.gov

14. "U.S. Economic Policy Towards Africa" http://www.info.usaid.gov

15. Robinson, Randall "Letter from TransAfrica" http://www.citizen.org

 

~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//~//