Discussion Leader: Fred Emery, Philip Harter
Summary:
o Use of e-media to file comments for participation in rulemaking
o Plebiscite vs. deliberate democracy
o Ensure that certain sectors don’t hijack the process; i.e. “freeze
out others”
o Yahoo-esque personal searches and “my” user pages
o Education
Translate into plain English
Citizens only have so much time available
Outreach, accessibility, and meaningful participation
Focus on agency needs
RECOMMENDATIONS
personal search engine – active notification
“my town hall” : priority= high
“plain English” descriptions/explanatory documents – layperson
translation of legal/regulatory documents: priority=medium
education of the public re: regulatory/rulemaking process: priority= high
What is e-rulemaking? Dr. Harter: using e-rulemaking as communication process;
how broad should definition be?: priority= low
What is participation? Meaningful dialogue (accomplished with education?): priority=
high
template – creation of citizen/user-tools: priority= high
accessibility issues (compliance with ADA): priority= medium
citizen involvement in designing the portal/format: priority= high
TOP PRIORITIES:
accessibility
outreach and education
making participation meaningful
citizen involvement in designing the portal/format of e-rulemaking
Discussion Leader: Neil Eisner
Summary:
• Interests affected:
o Anyone willing to participate
Take into account different groups with different needs and characteristics
• Educating the public with regards to technology
o Need to develop usable tool
o Need to take into account costs and availability of the internet, as well
as computer literacy
o Create easier access for people without computer skills and/or availability
• Regulations need to be readable and comprehensive for both the agencies
and the general public
• Provide question and answer sessions on the internet or provide an 1800
number where people can ask questions
o Keep in mind limited federal resources
How to pay someone to answer questions in a chat room
Analyze costs and benefits
Money spent to help achieve better outcomes
• A significant percentage of the population is not involved in the rulemaking
process
o They may have the information needed to write better regulations
• What can and cannot go out to the public i.e. copyrighted material
o The user community needs to decide whether they want the copyrighted material
protected and obscenities deleted
o Requires a trust in the technology