Euthanasia
Killing vs. letting
die
-
Rachels: No moral
difference (Smith/Jones)
-
May have duty
not to let die, as well as duty not to kill (physician)
-
Callahan: Assumes
we know and control everything
-
Everyone has a
duty not to kill others; also duty not to let die in some circumstances
Depends on obligations
of physicians
Voluntary/nonvoluntary
euthanasia: limits of consent
-
Should we ever
kill/let die patient who has not requested it?
-
Infants, comatose
-
Importance of
considering issue from point of view of patient
-
Should we ever
refuse the patient’s request?
-
paternalist considerations:
irrational state of mind, impulsive decision, lack of significant benefit
to patient
-
Rational/irrational
suicide
Social implications
-
slippery slope
-
abuse of vulnerable/minorities
-
differences among
cultures
-
effect on attitudes
toward handicapped
-
effect on development
of cures and painkillers
state interest
in not making physicians killers (Noonan)