Nigeria Deforestation (BENDL Case)



        CASE NUMBER:        191
        CASE MNEMONIC:      BENDL
        CASE NAME:          Nigeria Deforestation

A.   IDENTIFICATION
1.   The issue

     Nigeria's tropical forest is depleting fast because of human
influence.  This is a problem at the macro and micro -level; such
depletion is the result of government activities such as road
development, arable farming, and land clearing for pasture. 
Statistic has shown that there is a negative correlation between
exploitation of the forest and conservation in Nigeria, and
according to Osemeobo, "the deficits in timber supply increased
pressures on logging and the illegal trade (Osemeobo, 319)."

2.   Description

                                                            
     Projected demand, supply and deficit of forest products in
     Nigeria 1987-2020 (thousand m3 )
                                                                 
     PRODUCTS            DEMAND         SUPPLY         DEFICITS

     Fuelwood            628952         51540.0        577412
     Transmission poles   1410.2           42.1          1368.1
     Fencing poles        22598.9        1907.0         20691.9
     Sawlogs              51563          4217.0         47346
     Peeler logs for}       250.3          21.0           229.3
     match splint   }

     Wood wastes for }
     particle binding}      768.9          60.0            708.9
     Feller logs for
     veneer and plywood    4342.2         174.0           4168.4
     Pulpwood               726.2         350.0           376.2
     
     Total               710611.9       58311.1         652300.8
     
According to Aweto:      

     In Nigeria, the area previously characterized by  
     continuous forest cover has been converted into secondary
     regrowth vegetation, mainly as a result of shifting
     cultivation and lumbering. (Aweto, 127) 

     This is one of the controversial issues in international
trade.  While some individuals and states encourage such trade in
order to generate revenue, others are campaigning against such
trade on grounds that deforestation is devastating to the
environment.  The case of Nigeria is pathetic because the most
vulnerable group in the society (women and the poor) use some of
the wood as fire wood for cooking in the absence of cooking gas. 
Deforestation is a form of disinvestment for the future generations
because the nutrients in the soil would have been lost in time and
space.

     According to Anderson, "In low-income countries the
consumption of fuelwood energy by households is typically ten times
the total consumption of commercial energy for all purposes,
including transport and the generation of electricity; in Nigeria
it is twice the total (Anderson,7)."  This case study is not
restricted to one part of Nigeria, but both the north and the
south, and has international dimension.  According to Nigerian
Vice-President, Augustus Aikhomu, August 13, 1991, " Our
observation, however, is that the current rate of utilization of
plants and woods far out-strip the regeneration capacity of the
national vegetation."  

     There is no statistical proof to show that Nigeria has
immensely benefitted from lumber\timber trade, however, timber
trade existed either in form of domestic or external consumption. 
Anderson notes that "Unpublished surveys in the arid northern zones
of Nigeria, for instance, report that farm tree densities have
declined from 15 to 3 a hectare since the 1950s (Anderson,9)."In
recent time, the Federal government of Nigeria controlled timber
trade (export licence) in order to conform with the global out cry
about wood trade as it affects the ozone.

     Africa South of the Sahara, (using FAO estimates,'000 cubic
meters excluding bark) shows a yearly increase in the trade,
"Sawlogs, veneer logs and logs for sleepers, other industrial wood
and fuel wood (total) 101,598 (1987); 104,881 (1988); 108,298
(1989); (Africa, 2080)."  Timber\lumber trade between Nigeria and
Europe and Asia dates back to pre-independence, when the
colonialists exploited lumber to develop their economy.  These
forms of exploitation created a dependency syndrome between the
periphery (Nigeria) and core countries (the West).  Timber\lumber
exported from Nigeria were used as raw materials by European
industries such as; paper (newsprint), telecommunication, and
furniture.

     It is only in recent times that the world has witnessed an
increase in the world price of wood and lumber due to higher demand
in the world markets and other forms of control that affects the
supply.  You will note from Table 3 attached to this paper that:
for the 33 commodity index (which excludes petroleum), real prices
in 1992 averaged only half of the immediate post - war level. 
Timber is an exception because it is the only non-petroleum
commodity group that isn't close to it's  historical low.  Timber
prices, although have retreated from the 1980 high, have generally
been rising in real terms in the post-war period.  Although, the
Nigerian government in the 1980s tried to control this form of
export trade through the issuance of export licence, but due to
internal pressure, local needs, poverty , the government became
relaxed.  Others without export licence found ways to circumvent
the control. 

     Why did Nigeria become vulnerable to this kind of trade?  Lack
of enforcement of legal and environmental policies, and lack of an
efficient customs department to monitor smuggling; inadequate
knowledge and information about ecology; role of powerful interest
groups on the forest for agricultural purpose.  Besides, poverty,
urbanization, population growth and insecurity have contributed to
the vulnerability of Nigerians. 

3.   Related Cases

     There are some TED cases that relate to the timber trade in
Nigeria.  Such cases include:

     USWOOD Case
     AFRICA Case
     CHILE Case

     Keyword Clusters
     (1): Bio-geography               = TROPical
     (2): Environmental Problem       = DEFORestation
     (3): Trade Product               = WOOD

4. Draft authors: Shehu Ibrahim

B. LEGAL CLUSTER

5.   Agreement and Discourse: DISagreement and INPROGress
6.   Forum and Scope:  NIGERia and UNILATeral
     Timber trade in Nigeria in recent times is controlled by the
government.  Timber can only be traded with export license.  While
it is true that the government can directly conserve forest this
way, the inability to provide a substitute for cooking to the most
vulnerable would lead to the creation of scarcity and resultant
hike in the price of the product.  This higher price would lead to
social unrest thereby creating more security problem for the
government.  Another aspect of the licensing, is that it's subject
to abuse because of powerful interest groups that are in the trade;
besides , the government is also caught in the act of using the
licence to sustain patron-clientalist relationships in the society.
7.   Number of Parties affected: 1
8.   Legal standing: LAW
     Nigerian laws are derived from pre-20th century English
statutes, but are now modified to suit Nigeria's socio-cultural
realities.  However, most of the laws and decrees enacted in
respect of the trade are in accordance to Nigeria's National Law,
and International agreements.  Note that references to caps,
volumes and pages are as in the Laws of the Federation of Nigeria.
There exist custom application.  There is no case in court as
regards Bendel timber trade.


C.   GEOGRAPHIC FILTERS

10.  Geography

a) Continental domain:        AFRICA
b) Geographic site:           Western Africa [WAFR]
c) Geographic impact:         NIGERia

     The geographic domain in this case is West Africa, along which
the timber is being transported, and the activity areas would be
the conveyance routes, which include the Mediterranean sea,
Atlantic ocean, and River Niger estuary (Nigeria), and West coast
of Africa.

10.  Sub-state: YES

11.  Type of habitat:  TROPical

D.   TRADE FILTERS

12   Type of measure:  Export Ban [EXBAN]

13.  Impact:  DIRect
14.  Relation of measure to impact
     Directly related         YES  WOOD
     Indirectly related       NO
     Not related              NO
     Process                  YES  DEFORestation
15.  Product type:  WOOD
16.  Economic data
     Timber and log are raw materials used by furniture companies,
paper industries, electric and telephone poles.
17.  Degree of Competitive Impact: MEDium
18.  Industry sector: FOOD
19.  Exporter and Importer:  NIGERia and MANY

E. ENVIRONMENT CLUSTERS

20.  Environmental problem type:  DEFORestation
     Timber trade in Nigeria will continue to pose problems in
Nigeria.  The areas coded as forest reserve, rain forest, and swamp
forest would soon be devoid of forest because of urbanization and
development in general.  NEST (Nigerian Environmental Study Team)
cite Hodgson, L, "...Bendel State forest resources are depleted to
the point of exhaustion and the high forest is in great danger of
becoming a faint memory of the past (NEST, 157).  Timber trade and
the clearing of forests are both international and national, which
requires urgent attention because if they are not protected "global
carbon, oxygen and hydrologic cycles" would be de-stabilized.
Therefore, Nigeria government and state governments should create
laws and regulations governing the exploitation and replacement of
these resources.  
21.  Species information
     Annexes A and B show the threatened animal species that are of
concern in Nigeria, based on IUCM database; Nigerian Conservation
Strategy; Collar and Andrew, 1988): Mammals, Birds, Reptiles,
Amphibians.  Annex C  is a detailed endangered species of the
Nigerian Flora.
22.  Impact and Effect:  LOW and Structure [STRCT]
23.  Urgency and lifetime: HIGH and 100 of years
24.  Substitutes:  LIKE

F. OTHER FACTORS

25.  Culture: NO

26.  Human rights: YES
27.  Trans-boundary issues:  NO
28.  Relevant literature.

Aweto, A.O. "Plantation forestry and forest conservation in
     Nigeria."  The Environmentalist. 10:127-34 Summer 1990.
Agbede, O.O. "Improving agroforestry in Nigeria: effect of plant
     density and interaction and crop production." Forest Ecology
     and Management. v. 11. Aug. 1, 1985.
Federal Environmental Protection Agency, Nigeria. "Achieving
     Sustainable Development in Nigeria" National Report for the
     United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. Rio
     de Janeiro, Brazil. 1-12 1992.
Ghuman, B. S.; Lal, R. " Chloride movement in forest soils of
     Nigeria" Soil Science Society of America Journal. v. 50.    
     Sept/Oct. 1986.
Hulugalle, N. R.; Lal, R.  "Melioration of soil physical properties
     by mucuna after mechanized land clearing of a tropical rain
     forest"  Soil Science. v.141. Mar. 1986.
Hyink, David M.; Seve, Juan E., reviewer. "The economics of
     afforestation (book review)" Forest Science. v.37 June 1991.
Keay, R. W. J.; Hall, John B., reviewer.  "Trees of Nigeria (book
     review)" Forest Ecology and Management. v. 44. Nov. 15, 1991. 
"Nigeria" Africa South of the Sahara. England, Europa Publishing
     limited, 1993.
Nwoboshi, L. Chelunor. "Growth and nutrient requirements in a teak
     plantation age series in Nigeria.  Nutrient accumulation and
     minimum annual requirements." Forest Science. v. 30. Mar.
     1984.
Osemeobo, G.J.  "A financial analysis of forest land use in Bendel,
     Nigeria"  Forest Ecology and Management. v. 40 May 31, 1991.
Osemeobo, G.J. " Impacts of multiple forest land use on wildlife
     conservation in Bendel State, Nigeria"  Biological
     Conservation. v. 45 no3 (1988).
Osemeobo, G.J. "Land use policies and biotic conservation: problems
     and prospects for forestry development in Nigeria." table(s)
     Land Use Policy. 7:314-22. Oct 1990.
"Rubberwood : An export that conserves the environment."
     International Trade Forum 1993. n2.
               

                         ANNEX A
     TAXON                               COMMON NAME

Family Arthroleptidae 
Cardioglossa melanogaster     }         
Cardioglossa shioetzi         }         Amphibians
Leptodactylon bicolar         }

Family Cheloniidae                      Reptiles
Varanus examthematicus                  Short-tailed Lizard
Varanus niloticus                       Nile Monitor Lizard


Source : National Report for the United Nations Conference on
     Environment. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 1-12 June 1992.


                             ANNEX B
        NIGERIA: some threatened animal wildlife species.

     Common Names             Scientific Names         Status

     Drill                    Papio leucophaeus        Extinct
     Chimpanzee               Pan troglodytes          Endangered
     Gorilla                  Gorilla gorilla          Endangered
     African Elephant         Loxondonta africana      Endangered
     Leopard                  Panthera pardus          Extinct
     Lion                     Panthera leo             Endangered
     Ostrich                  Strithio camelus         Extinct
     Klipspringer             Oreotragus oreotragus    Endangered
     Water chevrotain         Crocodilus miloticus     Endangered

Source: IUCN, Nigeria: Conservation of Biological Diversity, World
     Conservation Monotoring Centre, Cambridge, UK, 1988, pp 54.

                             ANNEX C

     ENDANGERED SPECIES OF THE NIGERIAN FLORA DISTRIBUTION OF
     ENDANGERED PLANT SPECIES WITHIN THE DIFFERENT FAMILIES
                                                                  
Family               No of         Family                No of
                Endangered                          Endangered
             Plant Species                       Plant Species
        (a)                                   (b)                
ACANTHACEAE             26         CYATHEACEAE               
ADIANTACEAE              5         DENNSTAEDTIACEAE          1
AGAVACEAE                2         DICHAPETALACEAE          11
AMARANTACEAE             1         BBENACEAE                 7
ANANCARDIACEAE           7         ERICACEAE                 2
ANNONACEAE              15         ERIOCAULACEAE             3
APOCYNACEAE             19         EUPHORBIACEAE            31
ARACEAE                  3         FLACOURTIACEAE            7
ARALIACEAE               1         GENTIANACEAE              2
ARISTOLOCHIACEAE         3         GERANIACEAE               1   
ASCLEPIADACEAE           2         GNETACEAE                 1
ASPIDIACEAE              7         GOODENNIACEAE             1   
ASPLENIACEAE             6         GRAMINEAE                19
ATWYRIACEAE              2         GUTTIFERAE                4
BALSAMINACEAE            1         HYPHMENOPHYLACEAE         4
BEGONIACEAE              2         HYPERICABEAE              3
BORAGINACEAE             4         ICACINACEAE               2
APOCYNACEAE             19         GUTTIFERAE                4
ARACEAE                  3         IRICEAE                   1
ARALIACEAE               1         LABIATAE                  6
ARISTOLOCHIACEAE         3         LAURACEAE                 2
ASCLEPIADACEAE           2         LECYTHIDACEAE             2
ASPIDIACEAE              7         LEMNACEAE                 1
ASPLENIACEAE             6         LENTIBULARIACEAE          1
ATWYRIACEAE              2         LILIACEA                  2
BALSAMINACEAE            1         LOBELIACEAE               3
BEGONIACEAE              2         LOGANIACEAE               4
BORAGINACEAE             4         LOMARIOPSIDACEAE          2
BURSERACEAE              1         LORANTHACEAE              1
BUTOMACEAE               1         LYCOPODIACEAE             1
CAESALPINIACEAE         13         MALVACEAE                 1
CAPPARIDACEAE            2         MARANTACEAE               1
CARYOPHYCACEAE           2         MELASTOMATACEAE           8
CELASTRACEAE             6         MENISPERMABEAE            2
COMBRETACEAE             9         MIMOSACEAE                3
COMMELINACEAE            3         MONIMIACEAE               2
COMPOSITAE              36         MORACEAE                  2
CONNARACEAE              6         MYRTACEAE                 1
CONVOLVULACEAE           3         NAJADACEAE                1
CRUCIFERAE               1         OCHNACEAE                 1
CUCURBITACEAE            6         OBTOKNEMATACEAE           1
CYPERACEAE               1         OLACACEAE                 1
            (a)                              (b)                 
OLEACEAE                 1                                  
ONAGRABEAE               1
OPILLACACEAE             2
ORCHIDACEAE             23    
OROBANCHACEAE            1
OXALIDACEAE              2
PAPILIONACEAE            8
PEDALIACEAE              1
PITTOSPORACEAE           2
PLANTAGINACEAE           1
PODOSTEMACEAE            2
PROTACEAE                1
RANUNCULACEAE            2
ROSACEAE                 3
RUBIACEAE               16
RUTACEAE                 3
SALVADORACEAE            1
SANTALACEAE              1
SAPINDACEAE              8
SAPOTACEAE               2
SCROPHULARIACEAE         2
SCYTOPETALACEAE          2
SELAGINELLACEAE          1
SIMAROUBACEAE            2
SLOANACEAE               1
STERCULIACEAE            4
THELYPTERIODACEAE        2
THYMELAEACEAE            3
TILIACEAE                2
ULMACEAE                 1
UMELLIFERAE              3
URTICACEAE               2
VERBENACEAE              2
VIOLACEAE                2
VITTARIACEAE             1
VOCHYSIACEAE             1
XYRIDACEAE               1
ZINGIBERACEAE            2

 
Source: Federal Environmental Protection Agency, August, 1991.





Back to previous menu
Go to SUPER Page December 21, 1995